Occurrence record: MNCN-JL1:6565

HumanObservation of Nimbus proximus (Adam, 1994) recorded on 1986-11-29

Dataset

Data partner GBIF ES IPT
Data resource BANDAPHO, BAse de DAtos sobre Aphodiidae - Version 1.0
Institution code Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (CSIC)
Supplied institution code "MNCN"
Collection code BANDAPHO, Base de Datos de Aphodiidae
Catalog number 6565
Occurrence ID 318030969
Basis of record Observación humana
Identified by Veiga, C. M.
Observer Ibero, C.
Associated Occurrence Status Registro asociado
Associated occurrences The occurrence is associated with a representative record.
For more information see Inferred associated occurrence details
License CC-BY
Occurrence status present
Collection code MNCN-JL1
Abcd identification qualifier Not provided

Event

Record date 1986-11-29
Supplied as year:1986  month:11  day:29 
Date precision Day

Taxonomy

Scientific name Nimbus proximus (Adam, 1994)
Supplied scientific name "Nimbus proximus"
Taxon rank species
Kingdom Animalia
Phylum Arthropoda
Clase Insecta
Order Coleoptera
Family Aphodiidae
Genus Nimbus
Species Nimbus proximus
Taxonomic issue Sin errores
Name match metric Exact match
El nombre proporcionado coincidió exactamente con el nombre.
Name parse type wellformed
Scientific name authorship Ádám, 1994

Geospatial

Country Spain
Supplied as "ES"
State / Province Guadalajara
Locality La Hiruela
Latitud 41.06
Longitud -3.42
Geodetic datum EPSG:4326
Maximum elevation in meters 1257
Coordinate uncertainty in meters 7071
County M
Verbatim longitude -3.4200000762939
Verbatim latitude 41.060001373291

User flagged issues 

User Assertion Status:

    Data quality tests

    Test name Result
    Coordinate precision and uncertainty transposed Failed
    Possible duplicate record Warning
    Occurrence status assumed to be present Warning
    Coordinates derived from verbatim coordinates Warning
    First of the month Passed
    Coordinates are out of range for species Passed
    Invalid collection date Passed
    Missing name of person who identified the specimen/observation Passed
    Incomplete collection date Passed
    Missing coordinate precision Passed
    Resource taxonomic scope mismatch Passed
    Supplied country not recognised Passed
    Missing catalogue number Passed
    Coordinates centre of country Passed
    Country inferred from coordinates Passed
    Zero latitude Passed
    Name not supplied Passed
    Data are generalised Passed
    Supplied coordinates centre of state Passed
    Coordinate uncertainty not specified Passed
    Zero longitude Passed
    Collection code not recognised Passed
    Basis of record not supplied Passed
    Name not in national checklists Passed
    Collector name unparseable Passed
    Name not recognised Passed
    Coordinates are transposed Passed
    Unparseable verbatim coordinates Passed
    Invalid scientific name Passed
    Location not supplied Passed
    Institution code not recognised Passed
    Missing geodetic datum Passed
    Supplied coordinates are zero Passed
    Basis of record badly formed Passed
    Kingdom not recognised Passed
    Show/Hide 10 missing properties
    Show/Hide 41 tests that have not been run

    Inferred associated occurrence details

    This record is associated with the representative record. This mean another record has been detected to be similar to this record, and that the other record (the representative record) has the most detailed information for the occurrence. More information about the duplication detection methods and terminology in use is available here:

    Representative Record
    Record UUID 4d76cfa6-f82f-4dca-868e-84ed26203fb6
    Data Resource
    Raw Scientific Name Nimbus proximus
    Coordinates 41.06,-3.42
    Collector [Ibero, C.]
    Year 1986
    Month 11
    Related records
    Record UUID a9feb5d6-6b42-4f1b-a3c8-1a7b0f37a0df
    Data Resource
    Raw Scientific Name Nimbus proximus
    Coordinates 41.06,-3.42
    Collector [Ibero, C.]
    Year 1986
    Month 11
    Comments Los colectores eran idénticos
    Se comparó la ocurrencia sin fecha
    Las coordenadas eran idénticas

    Delete this verification